<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NetStumbler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netstumbler.com/category/ieee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netstumbler.com</link>
	<description>The award-winning wireless networking tool and the best source for your daily Wi-Fi, WiMAX, 3G and VoIP news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:52:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wireless Standards Group Changes Rules For Parity</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/25/wireless-standards-group-changes-rules-for-parity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/25/wireless-standards-group-changes-rules-for-parity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kristin Abraham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/25/wireless-standards-group-changes-rules-for-parity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IEEE 802.20 working group has changed its voting rules after allegations that Qualcomm Inc. was trying to dominate the process. In the past IEEE members voted as individuals no matter what company they were affiliated with. Now each entity, ie vendors, research groups, universities, etc will have only one vote and thus limit the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IEEE 802.20 working group has changed its voting rules after allegations that Qualcomm Inc. was trying to dominate the process.</p>
<p>In the past IEEE members voted as individuals no matter what company they were affiliated with. Now each entity, ie vendors, research groups, universities, etc will have only one vote and thus limit the ability of one company to sway voting results. Paul Nikolich, Chairman of the 802.20 Committee hopes the change will push forward the standard decision.<br />
Via [<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20070722/tc_pcworld/134828">news.yahoo.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/25/wireless-standards-group-changes-rules-for-parity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>802.11n Gear To Get Seal Of Approval</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/16/80211n-gear-to-get-seal-of-approval/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/16/80211n-gear-to-get-seal-of-approval/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 07:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kristin Abraham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[802.11n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/16/80211n-gear-to-get-seal-of-approval/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like the Wi-Fi Alliance is pushing forward, using the latest draft of the 802.11n standard. This means &#8220;Wi-Fi Certified&#8221; products should be hitting the shelves this summer. Eight laboratories around the globe have begun testing pre-standard products to see if they stick to WPA2 protocols and if they are backwards compatible with other [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the Wi-Fi Alliance is pushing forward, using the latest draft of the 802.11n standard. This means &#8220;Wi-Fi Certified&#8221; products should be hitting the shelves this summer.</p>
<p>Eight laboratories around the globe have begun testing pre-standard products to see if they stick to WPA2 protocols and if they are backwards compatible with other 802.11 a/b/g WLAN products that have already earned certification.</p>
<p>Although IEEE&#8217;s 802.11n standard isn&#8217;t expected to be ratified until early 2009, these pre-certification products are expected to reap this year&#8217;s back-to-school dollars.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.crn.com/networking/200000832">crn.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/16/80211n-gear-to-get-seal-of-approval/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>802.11n Wi-Fi Draft Approved By IEEE</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/03/23/80211n-wi-fi-draft-approved-by-ieee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/03/23/80211n-wi-fi-draft-approved-by-ieee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[802.11n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An IEEE working group endorsed draft 2.0 of the 802.11n wireless-networking standard, thus paving the way for a possible sale of products based on this spec by as early as this summer. With the approval, WLAN adapters and access points supporting the standard will need no radical upgrade to comply with the final spec, which [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An IEEE working group endorsed draft 2.0 of the 802.11n wireless-networking standard, thus paving the way for a possible sale of products based on this spec by as early as this summer. With the approval, WLAN adapters and access points supporting the standard will need no radical upgrade to comply with the final spec, which is expected to be ratified in late 2008.</p>
<p>Last year, the Wi-Fi Alliance announced its plans to begin interoperability testing program for draft 2.0 equipment by June this year as well as certify and brand draft 2.0 compliant products, a reversal of a policy that only allowed testing of devices that comply with a final IEEE protocol.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?newsid=8692">pcadvisor.co.uk</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/03/23/80211n-wi-fi-draft-approved-by-ieee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Work Begins On 1Gbps Mobile WiMAX Spec</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/02/23/work-begins-on-1gbps-mobile-wimax-spec/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/02/23/work-begins-on-1gbps-mobile-wimax-spec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiMAX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IEEE has started working on 802.16m, a protocol that promises WiMAX speeds of up to 1Gbps and backward compatibility with 802.16e-2005 or Mobile WiMax. The group hopes to conclude the technology development phase by the end of this year, vote on the spec in 2008, and ratify as well as finalize it by the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IEEE has started working on 802.16m, a protocol that promises WiMAX speeds of up to 1Gbps and backward compatibility with 802.16e-2005 or Mobile WiMax. The group hopes to conclude the technology development phase by the end of this year, vote on the spec in 2008, and ratify as well as finalize it by the following year.</p>
<p>The proposed &#8220;Gigabit WiMax&#8221; standard will employ multiple-input/multiple-output (MIMO) antenna technology but the arrays will be larger to boost bandwidth. Cellular companies are banking on the new spec to enable &#8220;convergence&#8221; 4G as it would combine two parallel streams of wireless technology, i.e., 3G and 802.16. The protocol could also allow wireless providers to offer a range of services similar to those by wired networks, including video streaming, IPTV, and VoIP.<br />
Via [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070221-8897.html">arstechnica.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/02/23/work-begins-on-1gbps-mobile-wimax-spec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RuBee Seen As Alternative Protocol To RFID</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/02/06/rubee-seen-as-alternative-protocol-to-rfid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/02/06/rubee-seen-as-alternative-protocol-to-rfid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 09:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IEEE working group for RuBee (IEEE 1902.1) is due to meet in Boston on February 20. RuBee, a wireless networking protocol deemed as an alternative to RFID, is expected to enable networks to run on long wavelengths and cover thousands of radio tags working below 450 kHz. It allows for real-time inventory under harsh [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IEEE working group for RuBee (IEEE 1902.1) is due to meet in Boston on February 20. RuBee, a wireless networking protocol deemed as an alternative to RFID, is expected to enable networks to run on long wavelengths and cover thousands of radio tags working below 450 kHz. It allows for real-time inventory under harsh environments, even close to metal and water and amid electromagnetic noise.</p>
<p>Because of its relatively slow speed, the specification is not appropriate for tracking scores of moving products in a standard warehouse but it is helpful for transmitting data directly to the Internet. With the use of lithium batteries, the battery life of RuBee radio tags is seen to last ten years or more.</p>
<p>The IEEE is encouraging &#8220;anyone interested in helping develop this standard&#8221; to be present at the February gathering. RuBee supporters include Tesco group in the U.K., Germany&#8217;s Metro chain, France-based Carrefour and BestBuy in the U.S. Chip makers, network equipment designers and systems developers like Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Sony, Panasonic, Motorola and NCR also back the development of the protocol.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.informationweek.com/management/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197000768&#038;subSection=Global">informationweek.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/02/06/rubee-seen-as-alternative-protocol-to-rfid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wireless-N Receives Unanimous Vote</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/01/31/wireless-n-receives-unanimous-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/01/31/wireless-n-receives-unanimous-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[802.11n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a gathering in London, the IEEE 802.11n working group has unanimously approved the second draft of the much-awaited next generation Wi-Fi standard. This development, along with the likely approval by the IEEE membersehip, would allow the Wi-Fi Alliance to begin certification of Draft N products by March. Glenn Fleishman of Wi-Fi Net News expects [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a gathering in London, the IEEE 802.11n working group has unanimously approved the second draft of the much-awaited next generation Wi-Fi standard. This development, along with the likely approval by the IEEE membersehip, would allow the Wi-Fi Alliance to begin certification of Draft N products by March. Glenn Fleishman of Wi-Fi Net News expects the alliance to release details of its branding scheme and sees &#8220;waves of firmware upgrades for existing products.&#8221; The latter could be the case for Draft 1.0 products like Netgear DG834N, Linksys WRT300N, Belkin N1, D-Link Rangebooster N650 and Buffalo Airstation Nfiniti, which failed to deliver the 300Mbit/s plus expected from 802.11n. Upgrade is likely to be easier for Draft 2.0 products, according to Eric Bangeman at Ars Technica.</p>
<p>Via [<a href="http://www.techworld.com/mobility/news/index.cfm?newsID=7820&#038;pagtype=all">techworld.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/01/31/wireless-n-receives-unanimous-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IEEE 802.11 Standard&#8217;s Evolution</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/11/30/ieee-80211-standards-evolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/11/30/ieee-80211-standards-evolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 07:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[802.11n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The evolution of wireless technologies brought lessons that are now driving the draft 802.11n efforts: 1) The WLAN industry made the right move of supporting legacy 802.11b rather than establishing a new and potentially higher-performing frequency band at 5 GHz, which could cause incompatibility among products. 2) Improving throughput in environments filled with interference from [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The evolution of wireless technologies brought lessons that are now driving the draft 802.11n efforts: </p>
<p>1) The WLAN industry made the right move of supporting legacy 802.11b rather than establishing a new and potentially higher-performing frequency band at 5 GHz, which could cause incompatibility among products. </p>
<p>2) Improving throughput in environments filled with interference from neighboring wireless networks means increasing the number and size of channels. The 802.11n task group is using the 5 GHz spectrum to make this possible. Because of better channel utilization, most 802.11n products are expected to deliver data speeds ranging from 100 Mbps to 300 Mbps. </p>
<p>3) There is a need for IEEE working groups and Wi-Fi Alliance to work in parallel, particularly with more and more products released into the market. Last year, the alliance began with the 802.11n certification process along with the IEEE 802.11n working group, a move that helped remove issues and differences as regards the standard. </p>
<p>4) Resolving latency problems is imperative in order for advanced applications like video streaming and VoIP to work on networks. </p>
<p>5) Any new protocol should manage packet overhead to make data transmission more efficient. IEEE 802.11n standard comes with frame aggregation capability, which allows for combining and sending a series of frames with one overhead frame without having to wait for each packet to be acknowledged individually. </p>
<p>6) Consensus is key to speedier agreement on standards. The creation of the Enhanced Wireless Consortium enabled competing camps to resolve technical issues and obtain consensus faster. The EWC came out with a draft that has gained universal acceptance with the IEEE 802.11n working group and is expected to be approved by early next year. </p>
<p>7) Wireless devices do not only refer to PCs anymore, thus a new wireless protocol must embrace other consumer electronic gadgets, which are used in tandem with home and corporate networks. </p>
<p>8) The demand for higher data transmission speeds means a need for more than one antenna and more than one radio stream, features that are inherent in draft 802.11n.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.ddj.com/dept/mobile/193500531">ddj.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/11/30/ieee-80211-standards-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IEEE Struggles With Video Wi-Fi Standard</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/09/05/ieee-struggles-with-video-wi-fi-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/09/05/ieee-struggles-with-video-wi-fi-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 08:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The second draft of the proposed IEEE standard for 100+Mbps wireless LANs will have to wait until January 2007, months later than many had hoped. The task group responsible for the development of the 802.11n standard is sifting through 12,000 comments to draft 1.0, half of which have already been addressed. Bill McFarland, CTO for [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second draft of the proposed IEEE standard for 100+Mbps wireless LANs will have to wait until January 2007, months later than many had hoped. The task group responsible for the development of the 802.11n standard is sifting through 12,000 comments to draft 1.0, half of which have already been addressed. Bill McFarland, CTO for Atheros Communications, a WLAN chip vendor, called the process &#8220;tedious and time-consuming.&#8221; Once the review is done, the task group will put the draft into a letter ballot, which would need the endorsement of 75 percent of the panel&#8217;s members in order for the standard to be accepted. This would signal that the draft has attained a level of stability that would open the market for a new generation of radio chipsets and products based on the said standard. The standard is expected to get final approval in early 2008.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?newsid=6804">pcadvisor.co.uk</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/09/05/ieee-struggles-with-video-wi-fi-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IEEE Suspends Wireless Group</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/06/27/ieee-suspends-wireless-group/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/06/27/ieee-suspends-wireless-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RenderMan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IEEE has suspended the 802.20 working group that was working on alternatives to WiMax. The group was suspended after infighting over which companies technology would be adopted. This delay means that WiMax should be the clear front runner for high speed wireless for the forseeable future. Via [news.zdnet.co.uk]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IEEE has suspended the 802.20 working group that was working on alternatives to WiMax. The group was suspended after infighting over which companies technology would be adopted. This delay means that WiMax should be the clear front runner for high speed wireless for the forseeable future.<br />
Via [<a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/communications/wireless/0,39020348,39275991,00.htm">news.zdnet.co.uk</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/06/27/ieee-suspends-wireless-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>802.11n Standard Fails To Gain IEEE Approval</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/05/11/80211n-standard-fails-to-gain-ieee-approval/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/05/11/80211n-standard-fails-to-gain-ieee-approval/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RenderMan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[802.11n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the draft of 802.11n back on the drawing board, vendors who jumped the gun and produced so called &#8216;pre-n&#8217; gear are now faced with the difficult challenge of what to do if thier products are not sompatible with the final standard. It will now be interesting to see if the devices live up to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the draft of 802.11n back on the drawing board, vendors who jumped the gun and produced so called &#8216;pre-n&#8217; gear are now faced with the difficult challenge of what to do if thier products are not sompatible with the final standard. It will now be interesting to see if the devices live up to interoperabilty and performance claims.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.mobilemag.com/content/100/104/C7701/">mobilemag.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/05/11/80211n-standard-fails-to-gain-ieee-approval/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>802.11w Fills Wireless Security Holes</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/04/12/80211w-fills-wireless-security-holes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/04/12/80211w-fills-wireless-security-holes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RenderMan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[802.11w is the latest entry into the 802.11 alphabet soup. .11w plans to extend security for wireless from just the payload part of the packet, to the managment frames as well. Currently thse frames are sent in the clear. These improvments should help prevent information about the network being leaked to an attacker. 802.11w also [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>802.11w is the latest entry into the 802.11 alphabet soup. .11w plans to extend security for wireless from just the payload part of the packet, to the managment frames as well. Currently thse frames are sent in the clear. These improvments should help prevent information about the network being leaked to an attacker. 802.11w also proposes to solve another problem with unauthenticated managment frames; the deauth DoS attack. By using one time passwords for deauth/dissassociate frames, the client and AP have the ability to tell if a deauth is legit or not.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/tech/2006/040306-80211w-wireless-security.html">networkworld.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/04/12/80211w-fills-wireless-security-holes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IEEE Group Reaches Pact On Mesh Wi-Fi</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/03/23/ieee-group-reaches-pact-on-mesh-wi-fi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/03/23/ieee-group-reaches-pact-on-mesh-wi-fi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RenderMan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wireless mesh networking is the key ingredient in making the dream of municipal WiFi a reality. That dream is a little closer with the adoption of 802.11s. Until recently there was no standard available for early adopters to use so they were risking alot if things changed from the method they were using. The lack [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wireless mesh networking is the key ingredient in making the dream of municipal WiFi a reality. That dream is a little closer with the adoption of 802.11s. Until recently there was no standard available for early adopters to use so they were risking alot if things changed from the method they were using. The lack of any in-fighting or competing proposed standards in 802.11s seems to be a rare event. This means that it should pass through quickly and we should see mesh networking gear on the market about a year from now.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.techworld.com/mobility/news/index.cfm?NewsID=5564">techworld.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/03/23/ieee-group-reaches-pact-on-mesh-wi-fi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bluetooth Set To Take Over Wireless From Wi-Fi&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/02/06/bluetooth-set-to-take-over-wireless-from-wi-fi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/02/06/bluetooth-set-to-take-over-wireless-from-wi-fi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 10:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Slavin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bluetooth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IEEE has abandoned its effort to create a UWB standard, but has agreed on a draft for the next generation of WiFi, 802.11n. The conventional wisdom is that this week&#8217;s events are great news for Wi-Fi, and a disaster for Ultra-Wide Band, UWB, and by association, Bluetooth. In fact, the exact opposite is likely [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IEEE has abandoned its effort to create a UWB standard, but has agreed on a draft for the next generation of WiFi, 802.11n. The conventional wisdom is that this week&#8217;s events are great news for Wi-Fi, and a disaster for Ultra-Wide Band, UWB, and by association, Bluetooth. In fact, the exact opposite is likely to be the judgment of the future.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/01/26/bluetooth_bests_wifi/">theregister.co.uk</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/02/06/bluetooth-set-to-take-over-wireless-from-wi-fi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed Standard Eases WLAN Management</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2005/11/07/proposed-standard-eases-wlan-management/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2005/11/07/proposed-standard-eases-wlan-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Slavin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In enterprise-class 802.11 deployments, network control is limited to the infrastructure, such as wireless switches and access points. Network administrators have little control over wireless client devices such as laptops, PDAs and voice over wireless phones. Uneven distribution of wireless clients on access points typically results in heavily unbalanced networks that suffer bandwidth and access [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In enterprise-class 802.11 deployments, network control is limited to the infrastructure, such as wireless switches and access points. Network administrators have little control over wireless client devices such as laptops, PDAs and voice over wireless phones. Uneven distribution of wireless clients on access points typically results in heavily unbalanced networks that suffer bandwidth and access problems.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/tech/2005/103105techupdate.html">networkworld.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2005/11/07/proposed-standard-eases-wlan-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double-barreled Wi-Fi Test</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2005/09/19/double-barreled-wi-fi-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2005/09/19/double-barreled-wi-fi-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Slavin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=1051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adding &#8220;wireless&#8221; to networking does more than change physical-layer-test requirements; it adds system complexity that needs simultaneous controlled testing of many layers. Via [Wireless networking based on the IEEE 802.11 standards is poised for substantial growth in both the numbers of units and the range of their applications. The mobility inherent in wireless networks, however, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding &#8220;wireless&#8221; to networking does more than change physical-layer-test requirements; it adds system complexity that needs simultaneous controlled testing of many layers.<br />
Via [<a href="Wireless networking based on the IEEE 802.11 standards is poised for substantial growth in both the numbers of units and the range of their applications. The mobility inherent in wireless networks, however, creates interactions between the physical and the protocol layers thatâ€”compared with wired networksâ€”greatly increase the complexity and number of tests necessary to verify a design. Fortunately, tools are becoming available to streamline the process.">Wireless networking based on the IEEE 802.11 standards is poised for substantial growth in both the numbers of units and the range of their applications. The mobility inherent in wireless networks, however, creates interactions between the physical and the protocol layers thatâ€”compared with wired networksâ€”greatly increase the complexity and number of tests necessary to verify a design. Fortunately, tools are becoming available to streamline the process.</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2005/09/19/double-barreled-wi-fi-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
