<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NetStumbler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netstumbler.com/category/standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netstumbler.com</link>
	<description>The award-winning wireless networking tool and the best source for your daily Wi-Fi, WiMAX, 3G and VoIP news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:52:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The State Of Wireless HDMI And WirelessHD</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/30/the-state-of-wireless-hdmi-and-wirelesshd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/30/the-state-of-wireless-hdmi-and-wirelesshd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kristin Abraham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiHD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/30/the-state-of-wireless-hdmi-and-wirelesshd/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HD television is on the horizon but it&#8217;s currently being held down by messy cables. There are two technologies competing to become standard but they&#8217;re not quite ready for prime time. Wireless HDMI (high definition multimedia interface) has come a long way and is actually expected to hit the market in September but the price [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HD television is on the horizon but it&#8217;s currently being held down by messy cables. There are two technologies competing to become standard but they&#8217;re not quite ready for prime time.</p>
<p>Wireless HDMI (high definition multimedia interface) has come a long way and is actually expected to hit the market in September but the price tag is expected to be a bit high.</p>
<p>The other technology, WirelessHD (WiHD), has gained the support of some big names in the industry but doesn&#8217;t currently have a release date in mind although a vague reference was made to 2008.<br />
Via [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070725-the-state-of-wireless-hdmi-and-wireless-hd.html">arstechnica.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/30/the-state-of-wireless-hdmi-and-wirelesshd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wireless Standards Group Changes Rules For Parity</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/25/wireless-standards-group-changes-rules-for-parity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/25/wireless-standards-group-changes-rules-for-parity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kristin Abraham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/25/wireless-standards-group-changes-rules-for-parity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IEEE 802.20 working group has changed its voting rules after allegations that Qualcomm Inc. was trying to dominate the process. In the past IEEE members voted as individuals no matter what company they were affiliated with. Now each entity, ie vendors, research groups, universities, etc will have only one vote and thus limit the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IEEE 802.20 working group has changed its voting rules after allegations that Qualcomm Inc. was trying to dominate the process.</p>
<p>In the past IEEE members voted as individuals no matter what company they were affiliated with. Now each entity, ie vendors, research groups, universities, etc will have only one vote and thus limit the ability of one company to sway voting results. Paul Nikolich, Chairman of the 802.20 Committee hopes the change will push forward the standard decision.<br />
Via [<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20070722/tc_pcworld/134828">news.yahoo.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/25/wireless-standards-group-changes-rules-for-parity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>802.11n Gear To Get Seal Of Approval</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/16/80211n-gear-to-get-seal-of-approval/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/16/80211n-gear-to-get-seal-of-approval/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 07:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kristin Abraham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[802.11n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/16/80211n-gear-to-get-seal-of-approval/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like the Wi-Fi Alliance is pushing forward, using the latest draft of the 802.11n standard. This means &#8220;Wi-Fi Certified&#8221; products should be hitting the shelves this summer. Eight laboratories around the globe have begun testing pre-standard products to see if they stick to WPA2 protocols and if they are backwards compatible with other [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the Wi-Fi Alliance is pushing forward, using the latest draft of the 802.11n standard. This means &#8220;Wi-Fi Certified&#8221; products should be hitting the shelves this summer.</p>
<p>Eight laboratories around the globe have begun testing pre-standard products to see if they stick to WPA2 protocols and if they are backwards compatible with other 802.11 a/b/g WLAN products that have already earned certification.</p>
<p>Although IEEE&#8217;s 802.11n standard isn&#8217;t expected to be ratified until early 2009, these pre-certification products are expected to reap this year&#8217;s back-to-school dollars.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.crn.com/networking/200000832">crn.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/07/16/80211n-gear-to-get-seal-of-approval/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could The French Hinder Draft N In Europe?</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/04/10/could-the-french-hinder-draft-n-in-europe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/04/10/could-the-french-hinder-draft-n-in-europe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[802.11n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A French regulation could impede the adoption of 802.11 Draft N standard in Europe. France was the first country to demand compliance with the latest version of the dynamic frequency selection &#8211; a mechanism enabling a WiFi system to move away from a channel once radar is detected &#8211; that European regulator ETSI released in [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A French regulation could impede the adoption of 802.11 Draft N standard in Europe. France was the first country to demand compliance with the latest version of the dynamic frequency selection &#8211; a mechanism enabling a WiFi system to move away from a channel once radar is detected &#8211; that European regulator ETSI released in October 2006. The European Commission ruling 2005/513/EC requires Europe to have unified regulations for 5 GHz spectrum and equipment makers to comply with EN 301 893 version 1.3.1 by March 2008. As such, selling of devices supporting the 1.2.3 of the DFS specification &#8211; basically all existing 5GHz WiFi equipment &#8211; is prohibited in France. </p>
<p>At present, industry groups like the EICTA, are working hard to change France&#8217;s stance. Tony Graziano, EICTA&#8217;s director of technical and regulatory affairs, said his group &#8220;is of the view that the position from France is in conflict with Community law.&#8221; He called on France to stick to the earlier version of EN 301 893 and throw away its demand on the newer variant.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.techworld.com/mobility/features/index.cfm?featureID=3271&#038;pagtype=samecatsamechan">techworld.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/04/10/could-the-french-hinder-draft-n-in-europe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wi-Fi Persists With Steady Evolution</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/03/29/wi-fi-persists-with-steady-evolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/03/29/wi-fi-persists-with-steady-evolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wi-Fi has become a staple technology in Australia. Sean Casey, business development manager of Intel Customer Solutions Group, considers the country a mature market, considering the uptake of the technology among consumers and businesses. Casey said the integration of a functional standard into handheld devices and laptops is driving the popularity of Wi-Fi. Part of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wi-Fi has become a staple technology in Australia. Sean Casey, business development manager of Intel Customer Solutions Group, considers the country a mature market, considering the uptake of the technology among consumers and businesses. Casey said the integration of a functional standard into handheld devices and laptops is driving the popularity of Wi-Fi.</p>
<p>Part of the appeal of Wi-Fi is that it provides a cheap way to access the Internet. But widespread commercial deployment, according to Paul Budde of communication consultancy BuddeComm, will take two to three years. The answer could be in the hands of resellers. Casey said resellers need to see that &#8220;wireless is where the market is going and resellers have to go and play in this area to service consumer and enterprise demand.&#8221; He believes SMEs represent a large market as &#8220;these firms don&#8217;t have IT departments &#8212; it is difficult for them to get to grips with Wi-Fi, but resellers can come in and add value on a consulting basis.&#8221;</p>
<p>Jim Kellett, product manager at Internode, is confident that WiFi will have a bright future ahead in Australia. Bjorn Landfeldt, a senior lecturer at the University of Sydney and a member of Smart Internet research, agreed with Kellett&#8217;s view. &#8220;Wi-Fi is definitely going to be one of the fundamental components in building infrastructure in the future. A lot of major players are interested in ensuring the technology is of a high standard.&#8221;<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.crn.com.au/story.aspx?CIID=76219">crn.com.au</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/03/29/wi-fi-persists-with-steady-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>802.11n Wi-Fi Draft Approved By IEEE</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/03/23/80211n-wi-fi-draft-approved-by-ieee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/03/23/80211n-wi-fi-draft-approved-by-ieee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[802.11n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An IEEE working group endorsed draft 2.0 of the 802.11n wireless-networking standard, thus paving the way for a possible sale of products based on this spec by as early as this summer. With the approval, WLAN adapters and access points supporting the standard will need no radical upgrade to comply with the final spec, which [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An IEEE working group endorsed draft 2.0 of the 802.11n wireless-networking standard, thus paving the way for a possible sale of products based on this spec by as early as this summer. With the approval, WLAN adapters and access points supporting the standard will need no radical upgrade to comply with the final spec, which is expected to be ratified in late 2008.</p>
<p>Last year, the Wi-Fi Alliance announced its plans to begin interoperability testing program for draft 2.0 equipment by June this year as well as certify and brand draft 2.0 compliant products, a reversal of a policy that only allowed testing of devices that comply with a final IEEE protocol.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?newsid=8692">pcadvisor.co.uk</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/03/23/80211n-wi-fi-draft-approved-by-ieee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Work Begins On 1Gbps Mobile WiMAX Spec</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/02/23/work-begins-on-1gbps-mobile-wimax-spec/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/02/23/work-begins-on-1gbps-mobile-wimax-spec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiMAX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IEEE has started working on 802.16m, a protocol that promises WiMAX speeds of up to 1Gbps and backward compatibility with 802.16e-2005 or Mobile WiMax. The group hopes to conclude the technology development phase by the end of this year, vote on the spec in 2008, and ratify as well as finalize it by the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IEEE has started working on 802.16m, a protocol that promises WiMAX speeds of up to 1Gbps and backward compatibility with 802.16e-2005 or Mobile WiMax. The group hopes to conclude the technology development phase by the end of this year, vote on the spec in 2008, and ratify as well as finalize it by the following year.</p>
<p>The proposed &#8220;Gigabit WiMax&#8221; standard will employ multiple-input/multiple-output (MIMO) antenna technology but the arrays will be larger to boost bandwidth. Cellular companies are banking on the new spec to enable &#8220;convergence&#8221; 4G as it would combine two parallel streams of wireless technology, i.e., 3G and 802.16. The protocol could also allow wireless providers to offer a range of services similar to those by wired networks, including video streaming, IPTV, and VoIP.<br />
Via [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070221-8897.html">arstechnica.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/02/23/work-begins-on-1gbps-mobile-wimax-spec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RuBee Seen As Alternative Protocol To RFID</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/02/06/rubee-seen-as-alternative-protocol-to-rfid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/02/06/rubee-seen-as-alternative-protocol-to-rfid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 09:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IEEE working group for RuBee (IEEE 1902.1) is due to meet in Boston on February 20. RuBee, a wireless networking protocol deemed as an alternative to RFID, is expected to enable networks to run on long wavelengths and cover thousands of radio tags working below 450 kHz. It allows for real-time inventory under harsh [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IEEE working group for RuBee (IEEE 1902.1) is due to meet in Boston on February 20. RuBee, a wireless networking protocol deemed as an alternative to RFID, is expected to enable networks to run on long wavelengths and cover thousands of radio tags working below 450 kHz. It allows for real-time inventory under harsh environments, even close to metal and water and amid electromagnetic noise.</p>
<p>Because of its relatively slow speed, the specification is not appropriate for tracking scores of moving products in a standard warehouse but it is helpful for transmitting data directly to the Internet. With the use of lithium batteries, the battery life of RuBee radio tags is seen to last ten years or more.</p>
<p>The IEEE is encouraging &#8220;anyone interested in helping develop this standard&#8221; to be present at the February gathering. RuBee supporters include Tesco group in the U.K., Germany&#8217;s Metro chain, France-based Carrefour and BestBuy in the U.S. Chip makers, network equipment designers and systems developers like Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Sony, Panasonic, Motorola and NCR also back the development of the protocol.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.informationweek.com/management/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197000768&#038;subSection=Global">informationweek.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/02/06/rubee-seen-as-alternative-protocol-to-rfid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Testing Faster Wi-Fi</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/01/29/testing-faster-wi-fi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/01/29/testing-faster-wi-fi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VeriWave is mounting a new blade in its WaveTest 90 chassis for testing 802.11n devices. According to VeriWave vice president of marketing Eran Karoly, the company has received requests for 802.11n device tests from infrastructure equipment makers like Cisco. The new WaveBlade houses a channel emulator for multipath signal simulation. It can perform tests on [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VeriWave is mounting a new blade in its WaveTest 90 chassis for testing 802.11n devices. According to VeriWave vice president of marketing Eran Karoly, the company has received requests for 802.11n device tests from infrastructure equipment makers like Cisco. The new WaveBlade houses a channel emulator for multipath signal simulation. It can perform tests on all the IEEE channel models and produce traffic to simulate up to 500 11n clients. The company said it can upgrade the blade&#8217;s baseband, MAC and protocol engines to complement the ratified 802.11n specification. Depending on the MIMO implementation, the new blade can have between two and four radio connectors. It will come with a $30,000 price tag and is due for market release in the second quarter of this year.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/news/article.php/3654406">wi-fiplanet.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/01/29/testing-faster-wi-fi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>802.11n Devices Are Fully Compatible With .11b/g</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/01/26/80211n-devices-are-fully-compatible-with-11bg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/01/26/80211n-devices-are-fully-compatible-with-11bg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[802.11n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SMC Networks has released its first 802.11n draft v.1-compatible products. It is offering SMC Barricade N wireless 4-port broadband router, which enables wired, 802.11b, g, or n wireless devices to share cable or DSL connections. The router features a 4-port 10/100Mbps LAN switch that is integrated with Automatic MDI-MDIX and a wireless access point that [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SMC Networks has released its first 802.11n draft v.1-compatible products. It is offering SMC Barricade N wireless 4-port broadband router, which enables wired, 802.11b, g, or n wireless devices to share cable or DSL connections. The router features a 4-port 10/100Mbps LAN switch that is integrated with Automatic MDI-MDIX and a wireless access point that can deliver speeds of up to 300Mbps. It also comes with a NAT firewall with Stateful Packet Inspection (SPI) to ensure its security, and renders sufficient bandwidth to perform applications like gaming, high-definition video streaming, file sharing and VoIP. The company&#8217;s latest 802.11n product line also includes EZ Connect N wireless PCI adapter and EZ Connect N wireless Cardbus adapter. SMC Networks is selling the router for $119.99, the PCI adapter for $89.99, and the Cardbus adapter for $79.99.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.eetasia.com/ART_8800449581_590626_f98c0250200701_no.HTM">eetasia.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2007/01/26/80211n-devices-are-fully-compatible-with-11bg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next-gen Nabaztag Wi-Fi Rabbit Delayed In U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/12/26/next-gen-nabaztag-wi-fi-rabbit-delayed-in-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/12/26/next-gen-nabaztag-wi-fi-rabbit-delayed-in-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shipment of the next generation of Nabaztag, a WiFi rabbit from French design house Violet, to the U.S. remains uncertain. The Nabaztag development blog cited issues raised by the Federal Communications Commission, which have now been cleared, for the delay. The new &#8220;Nabaztag/tag&#8221; is already available in France, the U.K., and the rest of Europe. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shipment of the next generation of Nabaztag, a WiFi rabbit from French design house Violet, to the U.S. remains uncertain. The Nabaztag development blog cited issues raised by the Federal Communications Commission, which have now been cleared, for the delay. The new &#8220;Nabaztag/tag&#8221; is already available in France, the U.K., and the rest of Europe.<br />
<br />
The WiFi bunny has revolving antenna ears that move like a conductor&#8217;s baton. Its white plastic body carries various integrated LEDs that flash in order to provide information &#8212; the movement of a specific stock or an incoming email &#8211; to its owner. The gizmo has a text-to-speech generator to read emails or Web pages. Violet put a &#8220;belly button&#8221; microphone for two-way, verbal communication in the next-gen version, which features an unlimited time playing capability for podcasts and web radios.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2072201,00.asp">pcmag.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/12/26/next-gen-nabaztag-wi-fi-rabbit-delayed-in-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruckus Wireless Announces Smart Wi-Fi</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/12/14/ruckus-wireless-announces-smart-wi-fi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/12/14/ruckus-wireless-announces-smart-wi-fi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[802.11n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ruckus Wireless unveiled &#8220;Smart N&#8221;, a new antenna and signal control technology for 802.11n access points. The wireless equipment maker plans to conduct a demonstration of the product at the Consumer Electronics Show, which will take place in Las Vegas in January 2007. The new solution involves several radios and antennas working concurrently and can [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruckus Wireless unveiled &#8220;Smart N&#8221;, a new antenna and signal control technology for 802.11n access points. The wireless equipment maker plans to conduct a demonstration of the product at the Consumer Electronics Show, which will take place in Las Vegas in January 2007. The new solution involves several radios and antennas working concurrently and can regulate the RF energy during data transmission, thus optimizing performance and reliability. It allows for simultaneous voice, video and data streaming.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2065091,00.asp">pcmag.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/12/14/ruckus-wireless-announces-smart-wi-fi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wi-Fi Standards Face Patent Threat</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/12/06/wi-fi-standards-face-patent-threat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/12/06/wi-fi-standards-face-patent-threat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 09:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A ruling by a federal judge in Tyler, Texas upheld the validity of a 1996 patent obtained by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) on a technology used in implementing wireless standards developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The said patent owned by Australia&#8217;s national science agency involves a [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A ruling by a federal judge in Tyler, Texas upheld the validity of a 1996 patent obtained by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) on a technology used in implementing wireless standards developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The said patent owned by Australia&#8217;s national science agency involves a key method for sending wireless signals via orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) modulation. IEEE standards such as 802.11a, 802.11g and the proposed 802.11n, which is due to be ratified next year, all employ OFDM for wireless data transmission. </p>
<p>Judge Leonard Davis&#8217; verdict also affirmed that WiFi routing gear maker Buffalo Technology has committed patent infringement. Unless it wins an appeal, the company could be required to pay no less than $1.5 million in damages to CSIRO. </p>
<p>Daniel J. Furniss of Townsend and Townsend and Crew, the law firm representing CSIRO, believes the decision could eventually translate to royalties being paid to the agency by over 100 companies. According to Furniss, CSIRO&#8217;s resolve to sue Buffalo ensued from the latter&#8217;s reluctance to discuss the agency&#8217;s claims. He did not give a specific number as to the amount of money CSIRO hopes to gain due to future license agreements.<br />
Via [<a href="http://news.com.com/2100-7351_3-6137372.html">news.com.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/12/06/wi-fi-standards-face-patent-threat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IEEE 802.11 Standard&#8217;s Evolution</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/11/30/ieee-80211-standards-evolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/11/30/ieee-80211-standards-evolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 07:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[802.11n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The evolution of wireless technologies brought lessons that are now driving the draft 802.11n efforts: 1) The WLAN industry made the right move of supporting legacy 802.11b rather than establishing a new and potentially higher-performing frequency band at 5 GHz, which could cause incompatibility among products. 2) Improving throughput in environments filled with interference from [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The evolution of wireless technologies brought lessons that are now driving the draft 802.11n efforts: </p>
<p>1) The WLAN industry made the right move of supporting legacy 802.11b rather than establishing a new and potentially higher-performing frequency band at 5 GHz, which could cause incompatibility among products. </p>
<p>2) Improving throughput in environments filled with interference from neighboring wireless networks means increasing the number and size of channels. The 802.11n task group is using the 5 GHz spectrum to make this possible. Because of better channel utilization, most 802.11n products are expected to deliver data speeds ranging from 100 Mbps to 300 Mbps. </p>
<p>3) There is a need for IEEE working groups and Wi-Fi Alliance to work in parallel, particularly with more and more products released into the market. Last year, the alliance began with the 802.11n certification process along with the IEEE 802.11n working group, a move that helped remove issues and differences as regards the standard. </p>
<p>4) Resolving latency problems is imperative in order for advanced applications like video streaming and VoIP to work on networks. </p>
<p>5) Any new protocol should manage packet overhead to make data transmission more efficient. IEEE 802.11n standard comes with frame aggregation capability, which allows for combining and sending a series of frames with one overhead frame without having to wait for each packet to be acknowledged individually. </p>
<p>6) Consensus is key to speedier agreement on standards. The creation of the Enhanced Wireless Consortium enabled competing camps to resolve technical issues and obtain consensus faster. The EWC came out with a draft that has gained universal acceptance with the IEEE 802.11n working group and is expected to be approved by early next year. </p>
<p>7) Wireless devices do not only refer to PCs anymore, thus a new wireless protocol must embrace other consumer electronic gadgets, which are used in tandem with home and corporate networks. </p>
<p>8) The demand for higher data transmission speeds means a need for more than one antenna and more than one radio stream, features that are inherent in draft 802.11n.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.ddj.com/dept/mobile/193500531">ddj.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/11/30/ieee-80211-standards-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time To Welcome Draft N?</title>
		<link>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/11/29/time-to-welcome-draft-n/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/11/29/time-to-welcome-draft-n/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Villarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[802.11n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netstumbler.com:8080/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Current developments make Draft N poised to hit the mainstream market next year, according to Mike Hurlston, Broadcom&#8217;s vice president of WLAN products. Hurlston said four laptop makers, i.e., Dell, Acer, Lenovo and HP, have announced plans to ship Draft N products. He also noted the improved cooperation among chipmakers, thus creating better interoperability among [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Current developments make Draft N poised to hit the mainstream market next year, according to Mike Hurlston, Broadcom&#8217;s vice president of WLAN products. Hurlston said four laptop makers, i.e., Dell, Acer, Lenovo and HP, have announced plans to ship Draft N products. He also noted the improved cooperation among chipmakers, thus creating better interoperability among products, and higher levels of performance. </p>
<p>At this point, Draft N products cater to small businesses and homes requiring one access point installation. Hurlston expects uptake among enterprises to increase once the full standard is released or until Cisco comes out with its 802.11n APs. But with more products hitting the market, enterprise vendors may feel the need to move &#8220;ahead of the standard.&#8221; </p>
<p>Hurlston believes Draft N will enjoy higher popularity in 2007. Intel, he said, is hinting about offering draft 11n cards early next year. Also, the WiFi Alliance will start branding Draft N products, which will likely extend to a third to forty percent of notebooks by the latter half of 2007. The number will increase to more than half by the end of the following year.<br />
Via [<a href="http://www.techworld.com/mobility/features/index.cfm?featureID=2955&#038;pagtype=samecatsamechan">techworld.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netstumbler.com/2006/11/29/time-to-welcome-draft-n/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
